HomeCrime and CourtsSupreme Court slams door on Marondera appeal in Elmswood case

Supreme Court slams door on Marondera appeal in Elmswood case

THE Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by the Municipality of Marondera of a High Court judgment in favour of property development company Swandev (Pvt) Ltd, following a protracted farm ownership dispute.

The High Court found Marondera guilty of illegally moving onto Elmswood Farm, carving it up into residential stands and flogging them to hopeful homebuyers — until owner Swandev took the council to court.

Justice Joel Mambara ruled Swandev was the lawful owner of the 886‑hectare farm, ending the confusing saga that left many buyers in limbo.

However, the council appealed the ruling, but the appeal was dismissed on a technicality.

“Reference is made to the civil appeal you filed on Thursday, the 19th of February, 2026. It is noted that you did not comply with Rule 24 (11) of the Supreme Court rules (2025) for the inspection of the record within the time specified,” the Supreme Court papers read.

“In terms of subrule (12) of rule 24 of the afore-mentioned rules, the appeal is regarded as abandoned and is hereby dismissed,” the Supreme Court ruled.

In his High Court judgment, Justice Mambara said Swandev was the rightful owner of Elmswood Farm by virtue of being a holder of a valid title deed.

“The applicant has demonstrated a clear right of ownership in the property. Ownership of land is a most fundamental right, protected both at common law and by section 71 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (which safeguards property rights),” the judgment read.

“By virtue of its registered title, the applicant enjoys dominium over the farm, which includes the right to exclude others from the property and to refuse any unconsented sale or allocation of portions thereof. “

“The respondent’s actions — advertising and selling plots on the applicant’s land — plainly interfere with the applicant’s rights as owner.”

He ruled that Marondera had no lawful authority to dispose of land it does not own.

“Therefore, the applicant’s right is not only clear; it is being actively infringed by the respondent. The first requirement for an interdict is thus satisfied,” he said.

Rant du Toit had been contracted by Swandev to develop the property.

However, operations were halted after the Municipality of Marondera moved onto the land, triggering a dispute that eventually spilled into the courts.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -spot_img

Most Popular

Recent Comments

spot_img